I’m often asked about the difference between the emerging and emergent church. The following article is one of the best that I’ve read on the subject. I don’t know of anyone better than Jason Carlson (www.Jude3.com) who approaches this subject with humility, honesty, and truth. He was involved with the emergent church movement during its conception. His perspective has been a tremendous blessing to me and countless others as well.
11/19/2011 “A Prophet Has No Honor” – Pastor Shane Idleman
5/7/2011 “The Danger of Idle Talk” – Pastor Shane Idleman
Over the next few weeks, Shane is revisiting articles that drew the most feedback in 2010. Here is the final one…
When terms “emergent” or “postmodern” are used, I’m referring to what is known collectively as The Emergent Church Movement. This movement is very popular among young adults. They believe that a new church should emerge in response to changes within our culture. This isn’t necessarily wrong if change operates within the perimeters of absolute truth; the EC movement, as a whole, however, is more about subjectivity than objectivity, experience than reason, relevance than repentance, outward works than inward change, and feelings than truth.
We are to detest division within the church, and work toward reconciliation whenever we can, but we must not confuse “attacking” with “contending.” I’m not challenging emergents if, by this term, one simply means reaching the world for Christ with God’s word as our standard. I was 37 when I began writing on this topic; I completely understand the need to be “culturally relevant.”